Sep 232012
 September 23, 2012  Posted by  Court, Surveillance, U.S.

An editorial in today’s New York Times relates to a recent ruling by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. Skinner that has privacy advocates concerned. The editors support a request for rehearing by the ACLU, EFF, and EPIC:

For the right to personal privacy to survive in America in this digital age, courts must be meticulous in applying longstanding privacy protections to new technology. This did not happen in an unfortunate ruling last month by a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

The case concerned a drug conviction based on information about the defendant’s location that the government acquired from a cellphone he carried on a three-day road trip in a motor home. The data, apparently obtained with a phone company’s help, led to a warrantless search of the motor home and the seizure of incriminating evidence.

The majority opinion held that there was no constitutional violation of the defendant’s rights because he “did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the data given off by his voluntarily procured pay-as-you-go cellphone.”

Read the editorial on The New York Times.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.