Jul 262011
 
 July 26, 2011  Court, Featured News, Surveillance, U.S.

Rich Lord reports:

A closely divided 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has found that the collection of DNA samples from people arrested — but not yet convicted — of crimes is constitutional, in an opinion released today.

In a precedent-setting ruling, the appeals court rejected U.S. District Judge David S. Cercone’s 2009 order finding that law enforcement could not collect DNA from Ruben Mitchell, who faces a federal charge of attempting to possess and distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine. Judge Cercone had found that requiring pre-trial detainees to submit DNA samples, which is done under the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000, violates the 4th Amendment’s search and seizure rules.

In an 8-6 ruling, the circuit judges found that people who are arrested have “a diminished expectation of privacy in their identities.

Read more on The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. You can read the ruling here (pdf).

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.