Apr 302014
 
 April 30, 2014  Posted by  Court, Surveillance, U.S.

Orin Kerr writes:

One of the recurring issues raised in the Supreme Court’s cell phone search arguments today asked the following question: What’s the practical difference a warrant requirement would make? If the government often will have probable cause to search the phone for evidence, and a warrant search can be quite invasive, how much privacy does it actually add to impose a warrant requirement? It’s an interesting question. Here are some thoughts on answers:

Read more on WaPo The Volokh Conspiracy.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.