Orin Kerr writes:
The recent circuit split between the Fifth Circuit and the Eleventh Circuit over collecting cell-site records without a warrant prompts an interesting question about how Fourth Amendment doctrine responds to regional variation. Here’s the question: If two places adopt two different fourth Amendment standards, what law applies when the evidence collection involves both places?
Read more on WaPo The Volokh Conspiracy.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.