Jun 132016
 June 13, 2016  Posted by  Court, Surveillance, U.S.

Joe Cadillic sends along this item from FourthAmendment.com:

Riley does not apply to a search of a cell phone at the border. Calling it “investigatory” doesn’t add anything to the argument. “[A]n entire body of jurisprudence has been built around border searches, and the specific lexicon used by Defendant does not strip that paradigm of the temporal and spatial flexibility built into it.” United States v. Ramos, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73571 (S.D.Cal. June 3, 2016):

Read an excerpt from the opinion on FourthAmendment.com.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.