Apr 202016
 April 20, 2016  Court, Surveillance

Ellen Nakashima reports:

A public advocate appointed by the nation’s secretive surveillance court last year argued that a little-known provision of the PRISM program, which enables the FBI to query foreign intelligence information for evidence of domestic crime, violated the Constitution.

But the court disagreed with her.

Read more on Washington Post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.