Dec 142009
 
 December 14, 2009  Posted by  Court, Workplace

This editorial appears in today’s Star-Ledger:

The state Supreme Court has an opportunity to give a New Jersey employer a virtual smackdown and protect workers’ privacy. The court will decide whether an employee who corresponded with her lawyer through a personal e-mail account on a company-owned laptop was protected by attorney-client privilege.

Loving Care Agency accessed e-mails between nursing director Marina Stengart and her attorney, Peter Frazza, after she filed a lawsuit alleging sexual harassment and ethnic discrimination. At issue: Does the company’s policy, which permits digging through employees’ personal e-mails, carry more weight than attorney-client privilege?

Loving Care allowed employees to use its computers for personal e-mail, but with the warning that “such communications are not to be considered private.” Stengart used a web-based e-mail provider with a password, not the company’s e-mail. She said she had an expectation of privacy, but Loving Care argued that, as an executive, she should have known better.

Read more on NJ.com.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.