Dec 312013
 
 December 31, 2013  Posted by  Court, Featured News, Surveillance, U.S.

Jennifer Granick writes:

When should courts follow legal precedent and when should the law change?  This is a debate that underlies this month’s contrary decisions about the constitutionality of government collection of telephone call metadata under section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act.  And despite this week’s dual holdings in favor of the government—on this issue and on the issue of laptop border searches—a judicial consensus may be emerging that the Fourth Amendment must evolve along with technology and government surveillance capabilities.

Read more on Just Security.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.