Aug 152009
 August 15, 2009  Posted by  Non-U.S., Surveillance

In a previous post I pointed out the remarkable lack of transparency in the oversight of surveillance in Ireland. This has become all the more worrying since July when the remit of this oversight system was extended (by the Criminal Justice (Surveillance) Act 2009) beyond telephone tapping and data retention to include also the planting of covert audio bugs, video cameras and gps trackers. In effect, the Designated Judge has now been given (by ad hoc extensions of his role) oversight of most forms of surveillance – with public accountability in respect of this oversight remaining limited to a single page annual report.

Two recently published documents from the UK illustrate a better model of oversight.

Read more on IT Law in Ireland.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.