Jun 292018
 
 June 29, 2018  Posted by  Court, Surveillance, U.S.

Orin Kerr writes:

As regular readers know, I have argued in my academic writing that the Fourth Amendment should be interpreted to impose use restrictions on nonresponsive data seized pursuant to a computer search warrant. In a new decision, State v. Mansor, the Oregon Supreme Court appears to have adopted my approach under Oregon’s state equivalent of the Fourth Amendment.

Read more on The Volokh Conspiracy.

h/t, Joe Cadillic

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.