Jan 202018
 
 January 20, 2018  Posted by  Breaches, Online, U.S.

What rights, if any, do we have to be let alone while we are in public spaces?

While privacy law scholars like Professor Woodrow Hartzog develop their thoughts on privacy in public, I have a simple principle that guides me when responding to privacy intrusive behavior occurring in public spaces on the Internet:

Any right you may have to speak to me if I am out in public does not impose a duty on me to listen to you, to respond politely to you, or to passively accept your repeated unwanted attempts to insert yourself into my online life. 

The inspiration for this post is the fact that one Twitter user has repeatedly ignored my requests that she leave me alone on Twitter.  Even blocking her has not worked and she continues to try to insert herself into my online life.

Of note, in her Twitter profile, the privacy intruder actually claims to be a privacy advocate.

What genuine “privacy advocate” would refuse to respect someone else’s request that you leave them alone if they do not want to engage with you?

On Twitter, nobody may know you’re a fake privacy advocate.

So yesterday, I started asking people to please delete me from any replies to her tweets, as she was sending out group tweets that included me so that when others replied to her, I would see it and see her nick, etc. Everyone was very understanding and supportive.

Not surprisingly, perhaps, she subsequently whined that I had violated her privacy by telling others that I blocked her and by telling others that she’s disrespectful of my right to be let alone.

Can you hear the irony meters exploding?

Sock puppet

An “anonymous” comment was submitted to this site today about this issue. It purports to be from “[email protected]” There is no such Yahoo account. And it purports to be from someone the privacy intruder knows.  Do people still talk about “sock puppets?”

I am reproducing the submitted comment below, but will annotate it for you:

For a privacy advocate, I am dismayed you would tweet out to Twitter negative energy with someone you have a disdain for outside of your Twitter world.
(Tgtracieg).

Note that “Allison” named the Twitter account in question, which is something I had not done on this blog. She just made many more people aware of the problematic Twitter account.

Nothing in my tweets suggests any relationship or disdain for the Twitter user outside of Twitter.  This is all about Twitter and her failure to respect my right to be let alone on Twitter.

Those tweets are completely public for everyone to see.

Yes, they are. As is her rude conduct of butting into conversations and tweeting to me after I have asked her to leave me alone.

It’s wrong. Keep your personal issues against someone to yourself.

No, thanks. These are not personal issues. The issue of respecting people’s right to to be let alone, even on a social platform, is an issue our society needs to deal with.  I am taking a stand for my right to be let alone within public spaces by protesting  rude and disrespectful behavior.

You don’t know who knows who on your Twitter feed and who follows you. These things have a way of getting back to the person you are talking about on Twitter.

I hope they do so the Twitter user stops her egregious conduct when she realizes that she is damaging her online reputation by acting in such unacceptable ways on Twitter.

This is from a friend of the person you are speaking of on Twitter

Yeah, sure.

 

  2 Responses to “On Twitter, nobody may know you’re a fake privacy advocate”

  1. ya know, a lot of people all over the world use fake email addresses to drop in a comment or two or blogs or news sites. They are afraid they are going to keep getting spam stuff if they leave their email address.

    Also, I went scrolling through Twitter and all of these tweets. You neglected to put in this blog post some of the nasty comments that were directed towards her on your request. I get it, you dont want contact. At the same time, it enticed people just to be mean

  2. At my request? What message numbers were my requests?

    Update: the commenter never answered. It turned out “anonymous” was just another sock puppet.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.