Mar 022017
 
 March 2, 2017  Featured News, Govt, Online

Acting Federal Trade Commission Chairman Maureen K. Ohlhausen and Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai issued the following statement yesterday on the FCCs issuance of a temporary stay of a data security regulation:

The Federal Communications Commission and the Federal Trade Commission are committed to protecting the online privacy of American consumers. We believe that the best way to do that is through a comprehensive and consistent framework. After all, Americans care about the overall privacy of their information when they use the Internet, and they shouldnt have to be lawyers or engineers to figure out if their information is protected differently depending on which part of the Internet holds it.

Thats why we disagreed with the FCCs unilateral decision in 2015 to strip the FTC of its authority over broadband providers privacy and data security practices, removing an effective cop from the beat. The FTC has a long track record of protecting consumers privacy and security throughout the Internet ecosystem. It did not serve consumers interests to abandon this longstanding, bipartisan, successful approach.

We still believe that jurisdiction over broadband providers privacy and data security practices should be returned to the FTC, the nations expert agency with respect to these important subjects. All actors in the online space should be subject to the same rules, enforced by the same agency.

Until that happens, however, we will work together on harmonizing the FCCs privacy rules for broadband providers with the FTCs standards for other companies in the digital economy. Accordingly, the FCC today stayed one of its rules before it could take effect on March 2. This rule is not consistent with the FTCs privacy framework. The stay will remain in place only until the FCC is able to rule on a petition for reconsideration of its privacy rules.

Two years after the FCC stripped broadband consumers of FTC privacy protections, some now express concern that the temporary delay of a rule not yet in effect will leave consumers unprotected. We agree that it is vital to fill the consumer protection gap created by the FCC in 2015, and todays action is a step toward properly filling that gap. How that gap is filled matters. It does not serve consumers interests to create two distinct frameworksone for Internet service providers and one for all other online companies.

The federal government shouldnt favor one set of companies over another and certainly not when it comes to a marketplace as dynamic as the Internet. So going forward, we will work together to establish a technology-neutral privacy framework for the online world. Such a uniform approach is in the best interests of consumers and has a long track record of success.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.