Jan 172011
 January 17, 2011  Posted by  Breaches, Non-U.S.

Richard Chirgwin of The Register interviewed Roger Clarke about the recent Vodafone breach.  You can read the interview on their site, but here’s the part that caught my attention:

El Reg: What does the Privacy Act have to say about “bad apple” incidents – where the company didn’t intend to make customer data public, but an insider has breached its policies?

Clarke: The Privacy Act is almost irrelevant. It’s toothless and administered by an organization that doesn’t spend much time exercising those powers it has.

The problem isn’t the obligations, it’s the unenforceability of the obligations. [The Act] requires that security precautions be taken – and it’s covered by a reasonableness clause, so that you don’t have to have extraordinarily expensive security on not-very-interesting data.

There is an obligation, but what hasn’t happened is for the Privacy Commissioner to get out there, and get consultancies to advise it on how those obligations should be implemented in particular circumstances.

Clarke is not done criticizing the law and its enforcement, however.  Read the interview.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.