Oct 222015
 October 22, 2015  Court, Non-U.S., Surveillance

Ah. Now we’re seeing prosecutors in other countries dropping cases rather than reveal surveillance methods. RTÉ reports:

The prosecution case against three relatives of a prominent dissident republican collapsed in a Belfast Court today after a controversy about tracking devices used to gather information.


In a statement issued afterwards the Public Prosecution Service said that its case relied on evidence obtained from tracking devices that had been installed in vehicles.

It made a case to the judge that certain information about the devices should not be shared with the defendants but could be shared with an expert engaged by the defence team under a confidentiality agreement.

However, Mr Justice Colton decided that while accepting prosecution submissions about the sensitivity of the information, a fair trial required disclosure to the defendants.

The prosecution was not prepared to make known this information about the tracking devices.

Without this key element, the case collapsed.


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.