May 032011
 May 3, 2011  Posted by  Court, Surveillance

From, where you can read an excerpt from the ruling:

FL1 declines to follow Ohio’s Smith case and holds that a cell phone can be the subject of a search incident. The case surveys many cases on both sides of the issue. Smallwood v. State, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6050 (Fla. 1st DCA April 29, 2011)

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.