Nov 192012
 November 19, 2012  Posted by  Laws

Great blog post by Jennifer Grannick on CIS:

Advocates for renewal of the FISA Amendments Act (FAA) often argue that the statute poses no more harm to the privacy of innocent Americans than does the Wiretap Act, also known as Title III. After all, when FBI agents are tapping a suspected drug courier’s phones, his friends or mother may also call.  How is the FAA any different?

Actually, there are many important differences between Title III, the FAA and even traditional FISA intercept orders.  These differences mean that FAA is far more intrusive than Title III and poses a categorically different threat to the privacy of innocent Americans.

Read more on CIS.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.