Jan 292014
 
 January 29, 2014  Court, Surveillance, U.S.

Scott Koller writes:

Telephone recording laws in the United States are generally divided between one-party and two-party consent statutes.  California is a two-party state where both parties need to consent before a telephone conversation may be recorded.  In Annette Jonczyk v. First National Capital Corporation et al, a plaintiff brought a class action lawsuit against her husband’s employer for allegedly recording employee telephone conversations.

First National Capitol (“First National”) is a California corporation accused of recording telephone conversations in California.  However, the plaintiff is a resident of Missouri, a one-party consent state.  Under Missouri law, telephone conversations may be recorded so long as at least one-party to the conversation consents.  Here, the telephone calls underlying the plaintiff’s lawsuit took place while she was in Missouri.  With the choice-of-law deciding the outcome of the litigation, First National moved to dismiss the plaintiff’s claims on the grounds that because she is a Missouri resident, Missouri law should apply.

Read more on InformationLawGroup.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.