Robin Wauters writes:
And boy does this one come straight out of left field.
Bloomberg Businessweek first reported the news last Wednesday, but for whatever reason got the number of the patent-in-suit wrong (should be 5,884,272 and not 5,884,271), causing a great deal of confusion in subsequent reports.
I got hold of the complaint this morning (see below), and it actually makes for a great read.
Read more on TechCrunch.