Jun 092011
 
 June 9, 2011  Court, Surveillance

Hanni Fakhoury writes:

EFF recently joined several legal defense organizations, law professors and others to urge the Ohio Supreme Court to rule that warrantless surveillance of a car with a GPS tracking device violates the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures.

In State v. Johnson, the police planted a GPS tracking device on a van without a search warrant. They proceeded to monitor the van for days, ultimately tracking its movement from Cincinnati to Chicago. The Court of Appeals found that the police didn’t violate the Fourth Amendment’s guarantee against unreasonable search and seizure because the tracking didn’t constitute a “search.”

Read more on EFF.

 

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.