Oct 102018
 
 October 10, 2018  Posted by  Court, Surveillance

FourthAmendment.com summarizes a ruling that does not please Joe Cadillic:

Officers put a video camera in defendant’s back neighbor’s house to look at defendant’s back yard over the long term. This was similar to a pole camera, except that its view was the same as the back neighbor’s, and it did not violate the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Kubasiak, Oct 05, 2018 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 172514 (E.D. Wis. Oct. 4, 2018), R&R 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 172972 (E.D. Wis. Aug. 23, 2018).

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.