Dec 062016
 December 6, 2016  Posted by  Court, Surveillance, U.S.

Cyrus Farivar reports:

A US federal appeals court has rejected an effort to overturn the Portland Christmas tree bomber’s conviction on the grounds that the surveillance to initially identify the suspect did not, in fact, require a warrant. On Monday, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals also rejected an entrapment argument raised by lawyers for suspect Mohamed Osman Mohamud.

Read more on Ars Technica.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.