May 102012
 May 10, 2012  Posted by  Court, Workplace

Randy Ludlow reports:

Law-enforcement agencies are not required to publicly identify police officers when they face credible threats of physical retaliation for their on-the-job actions, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled today.

The officers’ constitutional right to privacy supersedes Ohio’s public-records laws, the justices unanimously ruled in the appeal of a case filed by The Cincinnati Enquirer against the Cincinnati Police Department.

Read more on The Columbus Dispatch.

  One Response to “Court: Police privacy trumps open-records law”

  1. Remember, most police are cowards, not usually the heroes they make themselves out to be. They have to hide.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.