Mar 202013
 March 20, 2013  Posted by  Laws, Online, Surveillance

Declan McCullagh filed this report after yesterday’s hearing on updating ECPA:

A historic lobbying effort today to update U.S. privacy laws for the 21st century seemed to be in danger of derailment by a law enforcement-backed proposal to require Internet companies and e-mail providers to keep records of what their users are doing online.

Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner, the chairman of a key House of Representatives subcommittee, said this morning that it was time to resuscitate the idea of the government mandating data retention. Sensenbrenner, a Wisconsin Republican, had drafted a mandatory logging proposal seven years ago that included prison terms for company executives who failed to comply. A law enforcement representative said today some form of data retention should be attached to the privacy bill.

Read more on CNET.  Having watched the hearing and then read a number of tweets about it, I think it’s important for people to discriminate between proposals concerning data retention and those concerning requests for data preservation in individual cases.

Thanks to Joe Cadillic for this link.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.