Sep 122011
 September 12, 2011  Posted by  Breaches, Laws, U.S.

Orin Kerr writes:

In his post below, Stewart Baker writes that DOJ official James Baker “gave a persuasive defense” of the broad view of that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act should apply to Terms of Service violations and employee restrictions on computers. In this post, I want to explain why I don’t find DOJ’s defense of existing law persuasive. I will then propose a statutory fix to reconcile DOJ’s concerns with the concerns of the CFAA’s critics — critics including myself.

Read more on The Volokh Conspiracy.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.