Oct 152015
 October 15, 2015  Posted by  Breaches, Court, Online

Evan Brown writes:

The Court of Appeal of California has held that defendant website operator – who posted arrestees’ mugshots and names, and generated revenue from advertisements using arrestees’ names and by accepting money to take the photos down – was not entitled to have the lawsuit against it dismissed. Defendant’s profiting from the photos and their takedown was not in connection with an issue of public interest, and therefore did not entitle defendant to the relief afforded by an anti-SLAPP motion.

Read more about Rogers v. Justmugshots.com on Internet Cases.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.