Dec 012010
 
 December 1, 2010  Court, Surveillance

Daniel Solove writes that he has  uploaded the final published version of his article, Fourth Amendment Pragmatism, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 1511 (2010) to SSRN.  Here’s the abstract:

In this essay, Professor Solove argues that the Fourth Amendment reasonable expectation of privacy test should be abandoned. Instead of engaging in a fruitless game of determining whether privacy is invaded, the United States Supreme Court should adopt a more pragmatic approach to the Fourth Amendment and directly face the issue of how to regulate government information gathering. There are two central questions in Fourth Amendment analysis: (1) The Coverage Question – Does the Fourth Amendment provide protection against a particular form of government information gathering? and (2) The Procedure Question – How should the Fourth Amendment regulate this form of government information gathering? The Coverage Question should be easy to answer: The Fourth Amendment should regulate whenever government information gathering creates problems of reasonable significance. Such a scope of coverage would be broad, and the attention wasted on the Coverage Question would be shifted to the Procedure Question. This pragmatic approach to the Fourth Amendment is consistent with its text and will make Fourth Amendment law coherent and comprehensive.

The earlier version of Dan’s essay had generated a lot of discussion and response several months ago, and I look forward to reading the final version.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.