The Court of Appeal yesterday discharged a super-injunction which had preventing reference to a privacy injunction obtained by Howard Donald of “Take That”. The decision, Ntuli v Donald ( EWCA Civ 1276) has received widespread coverage in the media – with over 200 items picked up by “Google News”. Much of this coverage focused on the “super-injunction” and anonymity aspects of the case – although this occupied only 14 of the 59 paragraphs of the judgment. Most of the judgment was devoted to consideration – and rejection – of the argument that the injunction should not have been granted at all.
Read more on Inforrm’s Blog.