Nov 152017
 
 November 15, 2017  Breaches, Business, Non-U.S.  Add comments

A complaint noted by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of New Zealand made their news down there. It’s actually an interesting case as there’s a complainant you may have no sympathy for, but you still need to consider whether what the business did was appropriate and acceptable:

A man who was named and shamed on Facebook by a business after his cheque bounced has lost a privacy complaint and bid for $50,000 compensation.

The business posted the man’s personal details online after a cheque for goods worth hundreds of dollars bounced and the man failed to answer or return phone calls, a blog post by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner.

[…]

The Privacy Commission said the business did not have the right to publish the man’s personal details as it was not a public sector law enforcement agency and the man’s actions did not constitute a serious threat.

However, it chose not to take any action as it said the man did not act in good faith during the investigation.

Read more on New Zealand Herald.

 

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>