If you happen to see this in time, you can catch the live stream of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security hearing on the reauthorization of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Amendments Act of 2008:
I’ve covered the controversy in Oxford over the use of CCTV in taxi cabs before. Here’s a pleasant update:
Controversial plans to record all conversations in Oxford’s taxis have been dropped after an outcry.
Oxford City Council this week agreed to reconsult on plans to demand cabbies install cameras.
But licensing boss Colin Cook said future plans would not insist on continuous sound recording following concerns from The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), the UK’s data watchdog.
Mr Cook said: “The continuous audio recording is not something we will be pursuing.”
Read more on The Oxford Times.
From the Information Commissioner’s Office:
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has begun a public consultation on a new anonymisation code of practice. The code will provide guidance on how information can be successfully anonymised and how to assess the risks of identification. The ICO has also launched a tendering process to establish a network of experts to share best practice around the release of data in an anonymised form.
Anonymisation techniques can convert personal data into a form so that individuals are no longer identifiable. The consultation will be relevant to any organisation that wants to release anonymised data, for example under the government’s open data agenda.
Christopher Graham, Information Commissioner said:
“The UK is putting more and more valuable data into the public domain. The open data agenda will see this process continue and I welcome the power this information gives the average UK citizen to understand how the public sector operates and hold organisations to account.
“However, while the public wants to see openness, they want to see their privacy rights respected too. The risks of anonymisation can sometimes be underestimated and in other cases overstated; organisations need to be aware of what those risks are and take a structured approach to assessing them, particularly in light of other personal information in the public domain.
“Anonymisation can allow organisations to publish or share useful information derived from personal data, whilst protecting the privacy rights of individuals. Our code will aim to provide clear, practical advice on how data can be anonymised. We are now inviting individuals and organisations to submit their views on how this can best be achieved.”
The consultation will play an important role in making sure that the new code achieves the right balance between the protection of individuals’ privacy and the benefits of making information publicly available.
The consultation will remain open for the next 12 weeks, before closing on 23 August 2012. A copy of the draft code and consultation document is available in the consultation section of the ICO website.
A final version of the ‘Anonymisation Code of Practice’ – incorporating any changes recurring from comments received – is due for publication in September.
The ICO would also like to hear from organisations interested in bidding for a funding allocation of £15,000 to create, develop and support a professional network for sharing expertise concerning anonymisation techniques and data release.
The purpose of the group will be to find the best ways of making more information available whilst safeguarding the privacy of individual citizens. The group’s work will eventually be fed back to the ICO and will influence future activity in this area.
Further information on the role of the group and the tendering process is available on the ICO website procurement page.
Jerry Hirsch reports:
A consumer group says a bill that would allow self-driving cars on California’s roads does not do enough to protect privacy.
The bill, SB 1298, sponsored by Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Pacoima), has passed the California Senate and is awaiting Assembly consideration in June. It establishes guidelines for “autonomous vehicles” to be tested and operated in California.
It has flown through the Legislature, passing the Senate unanimously.
Read more on The Los Angeles Times.