A dog named “Rally.”

comments Comments Off on A dog named “Rally.”
By , July 17, 2015 10:10 pm

We got Rally from a shelter.  The tag on her cage said she was a 3-month-old German Shepherd/collie mix, and since we already had one dog with that mix, we thought she’d make a great companion for the older dog. In time, we would come to realize that Rally was really a Heinz 57 varieties mutt, with a lot of terrier and almost no detectable German Shepherd or collie, but by then, it no longer mattered – she was our little nut job.

The shelter’s records also showed that “Nutter Butter,” as they had named her, had survived Parvo, something that kills about 90% of the dogs that contract it if they are not treated. Clearly, this little puppy was a survivor, but the illness had taken a toll and she seemed somewhat subdued as I took her out of her cage, held her in my arms, and fell in love with her. Minutes later, as I went to take her to the desk to complete the last paperwork in the adoption process, I found out why she was so subdued. The staff ran a final check on her and discovered that she was running a fever and had several infections. They took her away from me to examine her further. When they came back, they gently suggested I pick another puppy, as they didn’t think she would make it.

“No,” I told them. “She’s my puppy and she’s going to get better.” They tried again to convince me to pick another puppy. I resisted again and told them that they had to save her.

For the next week, she was in ICU. The staff would call me and give me bad news and suggest again and again that I find another puppy. And I’d refuse and ask them what they were doing to help her recover.  Every night, my family would drive to the shelter and visit her in the ICU. We’d hold her and explain to her that we wanted her to rally and get better so she could come home with us.

And so after yet another call from the ICU suggesting we let her go and pick another puppy, we turned our baseball caps backwards, formally re-named her “Rally,” and asked everyone to keep her in their prayers.

That was 11 years ago, and for the last 11 years, Rally has brought us laughter and love. Her early illnesses took a toll on her system and she’s had some problems, but overall, she’s done remarkably well for a dog who had such a rough start in life.

Tonight, though, Rally collapsed in the back yard. Suddenly unable to walk, she cried pitifully.

We rushed her to an emergency veterinary service who sent us to another hospital where they would be able to run an MRI. They gave her a pain injection to try to ease her misery and anxiety as she was in obvious and severe distress.

We do not know what caused this sudden problem – a slipped disc, a tumor, a stroke? We’ll find out more tomorrow after the surgical team evaluates her. I don’t know at what point they’ll run the MRI, but I expect they’ll need it to make the differential diagnosis. And what happens next, well, it will all depend on what they find.

So if you happen to see this post, please keep Rally in your prayers.  She could use lots of positive energy right now.

Thank you.

“Remember me with love and laughter”

comments Comments Off on “Remember me with love and laughter”
By , March 22, 2015 7:16 pm

My mother lived a long life, filled with family, good friends, and lots of laughter. In fact, it was her direct instruction to me that “Remember me with love and laughter” be on her grave marker.

It’s been over three years now since Mom passed away peacefully.  Today, my daughter and I laughed all over again remembering some of our favorite stories about her. And I’ve decided to share some of them with you, so here’s the first one:

Circa 2005, and well into her 80s, Mom went into a store to buy some cards and gift wrap. The young cashier rang up her purchases, and said, “That will be $18.65.”

“1865,” said Mom. “That was a very big year.”

“Why?” asked the young cashier. “Is that the year you were born?”

And yes, anyone who says our public education system works should meet that cashier….

More soon…



Wait, what?

comments Comments Off on Wait, what?
By , August 26, 2014 7:43 am

“A free society cannot tolerate its tolerance being trampled on,” Johanna Mikl-Leitner (ÖVP), the Austrian Interior Minister, was quoted as saying.

When I first read that, I thought, “Oh, she’s strongly protective of free speech and doesn’t wany laws that would restrict unpopular speech.”  But I was wrong, I guess, because it seems that she made the comment in the context of supporting a proposal that Austria should ban membership in Isis and ban the wearing of all Isis symbols.

Read more on The Local, which I go scratch my head some more and get more coffee.

Blue on black has got to stop.

comments Comments Off on Blue on black has got to stop.
By , August 19, 2014 6:06 pm

For some background, see my previous post.

Gary Fields and John R. Emshwiller have an article in the Wall Street Journal today: “As Arrest Records Rise, Americans Find Consequences Can Last a Lifetime.” The article goes on to point out that approximately 1 in 3 Americans are in the FBI’s criminal database, with serious consequences, even when charges are dropped.

That’s certainly concerning, but it can be even worse than that for some people who have never even been arrested but just get stopped by police because of the color of their skin. You know what I’m talking about: DWB (driving while black) stops are rampant. And it’s cost at least one young black man the job he wanted.

“Joe” (not his real name) is a young black man who wanted to be a police officer. He has no history of arrests, never belonged to a gang, never been in any kind of trouble, had good grades, has no tattoos, and did superbly on every test and screening for a Florida police department, scoring in the high 90’s or getting perfect scores. But he got rejected.

Why? Because, they said, his record showed he had been stopped numerous times by police while driving. He never was arrested or even ticketed, but the fact that he was stopped numerous times cost him the job.

So because racist cops stop young black men who have done nothing wrong other than being black, the young black people may lose out on jobs?

How can this be right or just?

When the young man’s father – who is himself a police officer in New York City – told me the story, I was outraged, and we talked about his son filing an EEOC complaint.

And in the process of discussing his son, he told me more about his own background – how he had originally applied to be a member of FDNY and had been denied because of discrimination, despite passing the physical and scoring highly on the written test and screenings. Eventually, he became a cop – not really to protect and serve others, he said, but to get the cops to stop harassing him.  He had been stopped by police so many times  – without cause – and decided that if he had a badge, maybe they would at least leave him alone and not harass him more.

It works, he told me. He still gets stopped a lot, but now he just shows them his badge, and he’s allowed to go on his way. Not even an apology from those stopping him.  I wonder how many other black police officers are also frequently stopped or harassed by police when they are off-duty.

Someone shouldn’t have to become a police officer to stop harassment by the police.

Tomorrow, Attorney General Eric Holder will be in Ferguson, Missouri. He says he’s unhappy with how some things have been handled there. He’s not the only one. But the blue on black problem is a national problem and needs a national solution. No young man should lose a job opportunity because of unwarranted and racist stops by police.  No man should be treated like a suspect or harassed by police just because of the color of his skin.

Enough already. If we need to implement punitive measures to discipline cops who make stops not based on reasonable suspicion, then let’s do it. And let’s make sure all cops are wearing their name badges with their numbers so that the public knows who stopped them and can file complaints.


How could it be that Darren Wilson did nothing wrong in killing Michael Brown?

comments Comments Off on How could it be that Darren Wilson did nothing wrong in killing Michael Brown?
By , August 19, 2014 6:03 pm

The last time I posted on this blog was back in February, and it was about the pervasive racism in our country that results in the killing of black youth with some impunity:

My heart goes out to the families of  black youth who were and will be killed because they are black. I could not and likely would not have said what Jordan Davis’s mother said after the jury verdict yesterday.  Her comments may have prevented riots, but Jordan Davis did not get justice yesterday. And nor will the next black teen unless there is a tectonic shift in our country.

There has been no tectonic shift since then, and now Ferguson, Missouri is dealing with yet another senseless death of a teenager – this one at the hands of a police officer who was sworn to protect and serve.

There are those who argue that since Mike Brown was unarmed, there’s no excuse and the officer, Darren Wilson, should be arrested and charged. There are those who argue that Wilson’s actions were justified. In what rational universe can the killing of an unarmed teen following a stop for walking in the street ever be considered justified? Would that we were living in a rational universe.

Yesterday, I took Baden’s preliminary autopsy results diagram to a cop I know. I won’t name him, but will just describe him as a black cop in New York City who’s almost exactly the same size as Michael Brown. And I said to him, “Show me how police can explain or justify this pattern of gun shots and this killing when Michael Brown was unarmed. How can this possibly be a justifiable killing?” The cop, who hadn’t followed the latest developments in the case glanced at the autopsy diagram and then said, “It’s easy. I’ll show you exactly how it probably went down.” And then he proceeded to demonstrate it for me, placing us about 30 feet apart.

He said from the gun shot pattern, Mike Brown probably charged the officer or kept coming towards him and wouldn’t stop.

“The kid has to get down on his knees when told to,” he said. “If he keeps moving towards the cop, the cop will fear for his own safety and will shoot.” In other words, the kid has to cooperate with the cop – or else. His words were echoed today in an OpEd headlined I’m a cop. If you don’t want to get hurt, don’t challenge me..

“How long do you think it will take me to get to you from here to where you are?” he asked me from 30+ feet away. I looked at the distance and calculated that with his long stride, it would take less than 2 seconds to cover the distance if he charged me, longer if he just walked towards me.

“At what point do you start shooting at me if I won’t drop to the ground with hands up?” he asked me. “You can’t wait until I’m 5 feet away to start shooting because even a shot to the chest isn’t going to bring me down or stop me. You have to start shooting when I’m further away to bring me down.”

And so he demonstrated the scenario the autopsy results suggested to him, and I stood in Darren Wilson’s place and felt the fear of a huge man coming towards me and not stopping.

Would I have shot in that situation if there was already some scuffle or problem between us, as has been suggested by some witness reports? Most likely, yes.  And yes, I know Officer Wilson is younger than me, bigger than me, in better shape, and is trained and had a gun and Mike Brown was unarmed, but in that moment with a huge man coming at me and not stopping, I could understand fear – if that’s what happened.

But is that what actually happened when Mike Brown was killed? I don’t know. Some witness reports say that Wilson opened fire on Brown before Brown moved towards him. All I do know is that the police keep leaking information to bias the public against Mike Brown. But even if Brown had robbed a convenience store and even if he had smoked pot, neither justifies a cop killing an unarmed man. Nor does contempt of cop justify the killing. Perhaps the only defense for Darren Wilson is that he feared for his own life in that encounter.

But then why not get back in his car and call for backup? Why pursue Brown and force the issue? How did it get to that point of no return? 

There are those, like my friend in the police department, who may pragmatically say that Mike Brown’s killing was avoidable if only Brown had dropped to his knees with hands up.  That may be true at that point, but how Officer Wilson handled the encounter at the very outset likely led to what became the fatal interaction. Did Wilson harass Brown or was he disrespectful to him? Would the fatal shooting have occurred if Wilson had handled things differently at the beginning? Probably not.

In considering Officer Wilson’s responsibility for the killing of Mike Brown, we should not overlook or downplay the decisions he made at the outset and the way he approached Brown and Brown’s friend at the beginning of the incident because when all is said and done, Wilson killed Brown. If you want to excuse or rationalize it by decisions Brown made in responding to the situation, then you must also consider decisions Wilson made at every stage of the interaction. Despite his huge size, Brown was just an 18-year old kid. The officer was the one with the training and duty to handle this better.

But I’m still struck by how my friend, an experienced police officer, immediately understood how this could all happen and be considered  justifiable  in the police’s eyes.

Yes, I know what some of you are likely thinking now. “Well, he’s a cop, so of course he’ll just try to justify this or see it this way or lie to cover up wrongdoing by Wilson. Even though he’s black, he’s blue.”

And nine out of 10 times, you’d probably be right, except that my friend actually hates cops and only became a cop to get them to stop harassing him. But more on that in my next post.

Panorama Theme by Themocracy